# Release 0.4.2 (2022-06-17) - [The new `ComplexFloat` trait][95] provides a generic abstraction between floating-point `T` and `Complex`. - [`Complex::exp` now handles edge cases with NaN and infinite parts][104]. **Contributors**: @cuviper, @JorisDeRidder, @obsgolem, @YakoYakoYokuYoku [95]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/95 [104]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/104 # Release 0.4.1 (2022-04-29) - [`Complex::from_str_radix` now returns an error for radix > 18][90], because 'i' and 'j' as digits are ambiguous with _i_ or _j_ imaginary parts. - [`Complex` now implements `bytemuck` traits when `T` does][100]. - [`Complex::cis` creates a complex with the given phase][101], _e__i_ θ. **Contributors**: @bluss, @bradleyharden, @cuviper, @rayhem [90]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/90 [100]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/100 [101]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/101 # Release 0.4.0 (2021-03-05) - `rand` support has been updated to 0.8, requiring Rust 1.36. **Contributors**: @cuviper # Release 0.3.1 (2020-10-29) - Clarify the license specification as "MIT OR Apache-2.0". **Contributors**: @cuviper # Release 0.3.0 (2020-06-13) ### Enhancements - [The new "libm" feature passes through to `num-traits`][73], enabling `Float` features on no-`std` builds. ### Breaking Changes - `num-complex` now requires Rust 1.31 or greater. - The "i128" opt-in feature was removed, now always available. - [Updated public dependences][65]: - `rand` support has been updated to 0.7, requiring Rust 1.32. - [Methods for `T: Float` now take values instead of references][82], most notably affecting the constructor `from_polar`. **Contributors**: @cuviper, @SOF3, @vks [65]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/65 [73]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/73 [82]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/82 # Release 0.2.4 (2020-01-09) - [`Complex::new` is now a `const fn` for Rust 1.31 and later][63]. - [Updated the `autocfg` build dependency to 1.0][68]. **Contributors**: @burrbull, @cuviper, @dingelish [63]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/63 [68]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/68 # Release 0.2.3 (2019-06-11) - [`Complex::sqrt()` is now more accurate for negative reals][60]. - [`Complex::cbrt()` computes the principal cube root][61]. **Contributors**: @cuviper [60]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/60 [61]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/61 # Release 0.2.2 (2019-06-10) - [`Complex::l1_norm()` computes the Manhattan distance from the origin][43]. - [`Complex::fdiv()` and `finv()` use floating-point for inversion][41], which may avoid overflows for some inputs, at the cost of trigonometric rounding. - [`Complex` now implements `num_traits::MulAdd` and `MulAddAssign`][44]. - [`Complex` now implements `Zero::set_zero` and `One::set_one`][57]. - [`Complex` now implements `num_traits::Pow` and adds `powi` and `powu`][56]. **Contributors**: @adamnemecek, @cuviper, @ignatenkobrain, @Schultzer [41]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/41 [43]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/43 [44]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/44 [56]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/56 [57]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/57 # Release 0.2.1 (2018-10-08) - [`Complex` now implements `ToPrimitive`, `FromPrimitive`, `AsPrimitive`, and `NumCast`][33]. **Contributors**: @cuviper, @termoshtt [33]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/33 # Release 0.2.0 (2018-05-24) ### Enhancements - [`Complex` now implements `num_traits::Inv` and `One::is_one`][17]. - [`Complex` now implements `Sum` and `Product`][11]. - [`Complex` now supports `i128` and `u128` components][27] with Rust 1.26+. - [`Complex` now optionally supports `rand` 0.5][28], implementing the `Standard` distribution and [a generic `ComplexDistribution`][30]. - [`Rem` with a scalar divisor now avoids `norm_sqr` overflow][25]. ### Breaking Changes - [`num-complex` now requires rustc 1.15 or greater][16]. - [There is now a `std` feature][22], enabled by default, along with the implication that building *without* this feature makes this a `#![no_std]` crate. A few methods now require `FloatCore`, and the remaining methods based on `Float` are only supported with `std`. - [The `serde` dependency has been updated to 1.0][7], and `rustc-serialize` is no longer supported by `num-complex`. **Contributors**: @clarcharr, @cuviper, @shingtaklam1324, @termoshtt [7]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/7 [11]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/11 [16]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/16 [17]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/17 [22]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/22 [25]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/25 [27]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/27 [28]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/28 [30]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/30 # Release 0.1.43 (2018-03-08) - [Fix a usage typo in README.md][20]. **Contributors**: @shingtaklam1324 [20]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex/pull/20 # Release 0.1.42 (2018-02-07) - [num-complex now has its own source repository][num-356] at [rust-num/num-complex][home]. **Contributors**: @cuviper [home]: https://github.com/rust-num/num-complex [num-356]: https://github.com/rust-num/num/pull/356 # Prior releases No prior release notes were kept. Thanks all the same to the many contributors that have made this crate what it is!